PM sentOriginally Posted by Marshall
Results 51 to 60 of 111
-
11-17-2015, 06:31 PM #51Senior Member
- Join Date
- Feb 2015
- Location
- No where, and everywhere
- Posts
- 3,052
-
11-17-2015, 06:45 PM #52Senior Member
- Join Date
- Feb 2013
- Location
- moved close to the lake.Some call it Gilford.
- Posts
- 11,842
Uninvited guests or party crashers? Originally Posted by Mark-II
GET OFF MY LAWN!
-
11-17-2015, 07:42 PM #53Super Moderator
- Join Date
- Jun 2014
- Location
- Stony Plain, AB
- Posts
- 1,294
Ok Petamocto you are the KING. Originally Posted by Petamocto
Bah, you're right. I was searching for "Beowolf" not "Beowulf".
Disregard and carry on, I can admit when I'm wrong.
But now, something completely different:
You want my Beowulf mags?
I just went and looked at the thread over there and right at the bottom (surprised it is still there) the OP states he found it posted on here and copied it over.
GOC is still leading the way
Last edited by greywolf67nt; 11-17-2015 at 07:48 PM.
CFSC and CRFSC Instructor to Santa
-
11-17-2015, 08:01 PM #54Senior Member
- Join Date
- Apr 2012
- Location
- Ontario
- Posts
- 1,461
Doesn't this also affect shotguns in so far as tubular magazines being originally designed for a shorter cartridge?
Remember High River!
-
11-17-2015, 08:03 PM #55Senior Member
- Join Date
- Mar 2014
- Location
- Arlington, VA
- Posts
- 7,493
Oh my god, man, don't post things like this?! Originally Posted by Neil Burke
-
The Following 2 Users Like This Post By Petamocto
Codyg14 (02-24-2017), knuckledragger (11-18-2015)
-
11-17-2015, 08:50 PM #56Senior Member
- Join Date
- Apr 2012
- Location
- Ontario
- Posts
- 1,461
You're kidding yourself if you think it hasn't already crossed their mind. Beowulf, just like the SA and CZ, are low hanging fruit. It would affect a lot more people if they went after the shotguns or the 40 s&w mags based on the same logic than the 50 Beo. Originally Posted by Petamocto
Remember High River!
-
11-17-2015, 09:01 PM #57
It is notable that I sent the request for clarification back in May and only now, after the election, did they respond to me... coincidence?? I think not.
It's Not Always a Matter of Need...
-
The Following 5 Users Like This Post By Marshall
Deuce-deuce (11-17-2015), Edenchef (11-18-2015), Rory McCanuck (11-17-2015), The Joe-Man (11-17-2015), webster (11-17-2015)
-
11-17-2015, 09:25 PM #58Senior Member
- Join Date
- May 2014
- Posts
- 179
Foxer's still writing his novel Originally Posted by Mark-II
-
The Following User Liked This Post By livewire0129
Mark-II (11-18-2015)
-
11-17-2015, 09:30 PM #59Senior Member
- Join Date
- Jan 2014
- Location
- Vancouver
- Posts
- 17,799
Shut up, you. Originally Posted by livewire0129
Foxer's still writing his novel
-
The Following 2 Users Like This Post By Foxer
Edenchef (11-18-2015), livewire0129 (11-17-2015)
-
11-17-2015, 09:45 PM #60Senior Member
- Join Date
- Jan 2014
- Location
- Vancouver
- Posts
- 17,799
For those wondering about the apperent contradiction, they're still saying that magazines designed for one gun are ok if they HAPPEN to fit in another gun.
They claim that the difference here is that it's a magazine designed for two guns. It's 'designed' to fit in a 223 based platform AND a 50 platform, thus being one mag designed for two guns.
That might well be hard for them to argue if it goes to court. The law does say that if a magazine is 'modified' from the original it doesn't count - and mags that are specifically designed for the 50 are designed for the 50.
It doesn't affect things like shotguns because of the nature of tube fed magazines. What was the 'original' capacity of a tube? How was the tube 'modified', etc. Shotguns have always held all kinds of different sizes so while they can say that the ar mags were originally designed for 223 you can't say all shotgun tube mags were originally designed for 2 3/4 or 3 inch or 2.5 or whatever.
Well we knew they were waiting for the results of the election to pick some of the fights they've had in mind so i guess this was inevitable. I don't know what the 'judges' are going to say but at least there's a reasonable chance of winning under the current law, tho i suspect that the powers that be will be looking for ways to come down on the cop's side.
Posting Permissions
